Animated vs. Static Learning Agents – My M.Ed. Capstone Research

You never know what’s going to happen when you go to a DevLearn session with Cammy Bean, folks. In her excellent session on Avoiding the Trap of Clicky-Clicky Bling-Bling, someone asked about the value of onscreen characters and Cammy mentioned the research I did for my M.Ed. capstone project this year… which reminded me that I still haven’t shared it here!

So, for regular readership and those who might have wandered here because of that session, here’s the super-short version:

I created two versions of a course with only a slight difference in multimedia, then invited participants to take the course, tracking behind the scenes which participants were given which version. I reported on the differences in:

  • immediate understanding of the content (level 2 for those of you who roll that way)
  • self-reported engagement measures (level 1)
  • LMS-reported engagement measures (whether the learners finished the course, how much they explored the optional areas)

And what aspect of multimedia did I test? I specifically focused on the use of a fully animated learning agent* — one that moves her lips and gestures with her hands — versus a static (image-only) one. And I found no statistically significant difference in positive outcomes. Zero. Zip. Nada. Bupkus.

So basically, if you’re thinking about sinking a lot of development time or money into developing fully animated learning agents in hopes of increasing engagement or retention, I think this is research that you will want to read. Some vendors of those tools distribute research that others have done, supporting the use of learning agents in some situations, but nowhere in my background research or in this project did I find evidence that animation — lip synchronization, hand gestures, body movements — increases positive outcomes.

You can read the full report here, and I would love to receive your feedback, comments, and questions below.

* A learning agent, also called an animated pedagogical agent (and sometimes dubiously called an avatar), is a character that guides the learner through the course, somewhat like a teacher, although learning agents can be interactive or merely multimedia. 

SCAD for Graphic Design Classes

Logo that reads SCAD - The University for Creative CareersI’ve been considering taking some classes from the Savannah College of Art and Design for a while. They have an awesome rep and a digital publishing certificate program that sounds like a good fit for learning design, but let’s face it… after finishing my M.Ed. this year, it’s going to be a while before I take on any new formal education.

I thought I’d share the idea, though, especially since they let me know a few days ago that they have grant money available for their distance education students who start in Fall 2011. See their Fall 2011 schedule here… Classes start September 12.

Calling All English Majors

So, you went to college and got you some knowledge. If you majored in English (as I did), you are probably sick of people assuming that you 1) won’t be able to get a job, or 2) are going to teach.

[youtube V946uL0xMTA]

I’m here to tell you that there are lots of things you can do. Instructional design may be one of them.

Why you should consider instructional design:

  1. It’s a booming industry.*
  2. You can make cool stuff.
  3. Really? In this economy, with an English degree, you need a third reason?

Why instructional design should consider you:

  1. You can research.
  2. You can write, both instructionally and creatively. Scenarios need plot, dialogue, even drama.
  3. You can edit. Copyediting skills are great and being able to distinguish between essential and peripheral information is better.

At least… I hope you can do those things. :) Happy graduation!

*There is actually no listing for Instruction Designer with the Bureau of Labor Statistics (or Salary.com), but related job outlooks, anecdotal evidence, and training industry trends all bode very well for elearning designers.